maxxis forekaster vs ardent

Rekon 2.6 up front and Rekon 2.4 rear. Want To Receive Exclusive Offers, Tips & Freebies? @honourablegeorge I reckon it would be Dissector up front, no? Lighter than the equivalent dhr2 and on that bike it probably doesnt need as much grip as on the fs bike which has got a dhr2 on it in the slop. Maxxis Users are generally very pleased by this tire, especially used in combination with a more aggressive design that offers better grip for added traction and better all-condition performance. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. Maxxis might have some of the most iconic XC/Trail tires like the Ikon and Ardent. Fishing 7.75K subscribers Subscribe 13K views 3 years ago Did a quick review of why I like this setup! The Ikon is a good option for riders who are looking for a less aggressive kind of trail ride, and who dont mind a little looseness in their ride. It also makes a great rear tire when looking for speed in the back and some more tread up front like what you would get with the Ardent, Ardent Race or Forekaster. Excludes Gift Memberships, Discount applies to first year. FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: The new Forekaster slots into the Maxxis mountain line between our XC options that prioritize rolling speed (Aspen, Rekon Race, Ikon, Rekon) and our gravity-focused treads (Dissector, Minion DHF, Minion DHR, Assegai) which emphasize cornering and braking traction. There are intermediate knobs but spaced out quite a bit more than the other tread, leaving a gap where there isn't an intermediate knob. They share similar terrain weaknesses but are also both highly durable options. I agree with Minimus, the Ardent is not a great tire. The Maxxis Forekaster is a bit more of a rarity to see, being the go-to Maxxis XC tire for very loose soil or mud. I got a Forecaster to last 18 months & was amazed to wear it out. The DHRII has large ramped knobs in the center that take up most of the tread, and then transition to classic Minion side knobs. I was thinking since it improved my cornering over the Ikon on the front, it might do the same for the rear, and if the tread is worn a bit, better to make it a faster rolling more grippy for corners rear tire. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. While the Maxxis DHRII might be considered to be an all-mountain/enduro/downhill tire, it provides a great grip to weight ratio when it's in the 2.3 widths and EXO protection. I've ridden through some nasty rock gardens and roots with these and have had zero issues. Anything more and that goes into the next category of tires. Earlier this year, the 2.6 Maxxis Forekaster won me over for its proficient, playful, and predictable mannerisms. USD Tire Contact UsPrivacyForum RulesClassifieds RulesLink RemovalNewsletter SettingsAdvertising. Run the same tire front and rear, run the same tread but large volume up front, or what most of us at Worldwide do: run a more aggressive front tire with a faster rolling rear tire so you can let it slide out back while being in control up front. The side nobs are not as aggressive as those on the Ardent. Great control under braking with L shaped side knobs allow some confident riding for a tire that rolls this fast. The Forekaster is also slightly more prone to drifting, especially mounted as the rear tire, or with a cyclist who tends to use the rear brake heavily. I've run the Ardent/Forekaster combo and it was better than a Forekaster on both. The harder-wearing PaceStar compound is recommended for the rear or youll be shelling out for new rubber very quickly. XC Tires Maxxis Forekaster 2.35" (Front) & Rekon Race 2.35" (Rear) EXO +Lightweight +Fast rolling-Less traction-Less durable . We ran it as a dedicated front. Aspen in the rear and slightly more tread up front like an Ikon or Ardent Race for dry, Aspen in the rear with a Forekaster up front for loose or wet conditions, Front and rear for fast, predictable handling with matched sizes, Front 2.35 and rear 2.2 for volume to speed, Rear with Ardent or Forekaster for loose or wet conditions. With the Protection reinforced sidewalls the casing is very tough and while the lovely logos of our test tyres are pretty scuffed up, we havent experienced any sidewall cuts or tears. FEATURES OF THE NEW MAXXIS FOREKASTER INCLUDE: A densely packed tread pattern to increase rolling efficiency Taller side knobs to improve cornering grip Raised ridges on the casing to promote. New Maxxis Forekaster: goodbye to damp, hello to downcountry? Marked as a 2.35, they dwarf just about all other non-downhill specific tyres out there. The center tread looks like a slimmed-down version of the High Roller II and the side knobs mimic the Minion, creating a lot of control you wouldn't expect from an XC tire. While it doesn't get picked up as much as these other dry tires do, it holds its place in the Maxxis lineup for the XC/Trail mud tire. 111 [Podcast], Best of the Month! When should you choose the new Forekaster? I currently use a Forekaster in the front in those wet Autumn and Winter months, and I gotta say, Ive not been impressed with it. . Maxxis have the Forekaster in both 27.5" and 29" models, in 2.25" width and 2.35" widths too. That said, the tread is only moderately aggressive, and it looks like less of an all-terrain all-condition tire than many of its competitors. Run a 2.6 x 27.5 one on my hardtail for a lot of the year. The blocky tread is somewhat of a wonderment, being very grippy on the loose stuff as well as equally adherent on bare rock something we werent expecting. My quoted 2.4in test tire looked great when inflated to 24psi on my 30mm . Anything more and that goes into the next category of tires. This year, Alberto Contador & Ivan Basso race off-road with the all-new Manto carbon gravel bike, the highest performance bike on the market, Peppermint Cycling Co. just announced its spring line a collection that includes new pieces across MTB, gravel, and road disciplines. However, the new tread pattern is more densely packed for better rolling efficiency and taller side knobs are there to really dig into the corners. If we rode great dirt conditions all the time, we wouldn't hesitate to mount this tire up on the front, rear, or both ends of our efficient mid-travel mountain bikes. I know that Maxx Terra tire wore phenomenally well though compared to the Maxx Speed after almost 400 miles the knobs are still sharp and pronounced and look brand new. The previous tire in 292.35 size was quoted at 745g. I wonder if I would give up climbing grip though it seems the Ikon has more tread knobs that would grab better. We envision the new Forekaster as the perfect companion for long, pedally rides in a variety of terrain. It might not be as classic as some of the other Maxxis XC tires, but it will surely create some great traction without the weight of some other tires. Thick branches can be a similar problem if your tire hits them pointy-end first. As with the other classic Maxxis tires, the Ardent is available in a huge range of sizes, casings and rubber options, so I will list our more common combinations and sizes that we see. MAXXIS Forekaster and Ardent Review - EXO TR 27.5 Michael B. Two thumbs up. Forekaster being light filled a nice gap. For the rear, I opted for something a little lighter that I thought might be more likely to give it up in fast tight turns. Not super light but it's worth it for the EXO protection and not feeling the need to carry a tube. In a nut shell, this tyre works best if youre fully committed to a corner and tip it in! Intended to be a "Goldilocks" tire, the new Forekaster (released July 2022) rolls faster than a Minion or even the Dissector but provides more predictable cornering, climbing, and braking traction than the Aspen or Rekon. Part of why they still have it in their line up is that it's popular as OE (cost reasons I guess). Youll be very pleased with the ride quality. Details and Specifications: Use: Aggressive XC,. Its also available in a 2.4 which wed consider as a great front tyre option for looser or sandier conditions; 2.25 out back, 2.4 up front = aggressive trail riding perfection. Singletracks Mountain Bike News, Product Reviews, MTB Trails and Community Protected: Forums Mountain Bike Forum Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire. The ardent race and icon if mostly hardpack trails. I could try it out and see. If the girl said no then the answer obviously is no, but she's not gonna say no. The low profile tread also has ramped center knobs allowing the Rekon to roll similarly to other dry XC tires. However, the thinner design of the Ikon combines with a less aggressive tread style to create a much looser grip. The hang up there is it's only .15 of an inch difference, and Maxxis tires often times won't measure out to their stated dimensions, so I might be stuck with the same tread after a swap if I just get a bigger Rekon. While there are a huge number of choices from Maxxis, we have picked out our favorite models and the combinations that we love to ride them in. The Maxxis tire combo is a tough one to beat these days. Apparently its now a tyre for short-travel trail bikes AKA downcountry bikes. - Forekaster - In my opinion Maxxis best all around Trail tire. This is another tire set that is often used together, but the Forekaster is a slightly looser, slightly faster option that adapts to aggressive riding styles somewhat better than the Ardent. The Maxxis Ikon tire might be the most classic XC tire in most recent years and is still winning WC XC races. This is not a tire that you need to worry about blowing the side walls before youve squeezed the last life out of the tread, which is saying something when the tread is as long-lasting as the Ardent. Great for XC trails and with a new tread and tire profile every few seasons, theyve cornered the market on creating a durable line of high-performance for price mountain bike tires. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Continue with Recommended Cookies. These look good, although hard to know where it sits vs the Dissector. A forum is a difficult place to get helpful information on tires. Just installed an Ardent Race 2.35 on the front. Regardless. This new one, Im not quite sure what its for. Maxxis Ardent, Bontrager XR4, Continental Trail King and Schwalbe Hans Dampf. With 90 kilos on the seat. Were told that the 29 x 2.4 Dual compound will be available very soon, with prices ranging from $83 to $101. About Us | When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. We received a 292.4 WT in 3C Maxx Terra, which is recommended for all mountain trails from hard pack to loose over hard. I know the 2.25 on my 29er and the 2.4 WT on my 27.5 measured out the same, and the 27.5 was on a rim that was 7mm wider internally. Prices start from 59.99 RRP. Good range of sizes. No complaints, wet, dry, good all around front trail use tire. product review Never again! Feast your eyes on these four tyres treads that roll fast but fill you with confidence in corners and when it gets rough. Although I am a Lancastrian, I freely admit that West Yorkshire is my favourite place to ride. For the terrain I ride, it has been a great combination on my SS and rolls surprisingly well for that kind of tire. It strikes a balance between speed and traction for the rear when riding aggressively. With more intermediate knobs than the Ardent tire, the Ardent Race looks more like an aggressive Ikon tire. The Ardent offers great traction in the beginning, but the weaknesses of the less aggressive tread design start to show within a few months of regular riding. The Maxxis Ardent is an XC and trail do-it-all tyre with a directional tread pattern that can be used on the front or rear. However, the large outer tread still performs just as well with moderate and even severe pitting, and the rubber doesnt lose reactivity or traction with wear and tear. I would not consider this the typical XC tire unless your typical XC race is the Downieville Classic where 3k feet of climbing is followed by 30mph+ descents. Was hoping it would be closer to 850g but still very keen to give them a go! They are available in a 2.4 as well, but not in Australia at present. I had a funny feeling that mentioning Ardents would draw some very good responses. I very much like my Forekaster front tire. Schwalbes have good grip and weight but tend to suck for durability and price. Use code HELLO54 when you join us as a print or digital member and your membership will be half price for the first year. With tons of options for front and rear, the combination is endless. I am having trouble on deciding between the Maxxis Forekaster 2.35 or the Ardents 2.4. The very photos here. Yeah, dissector, ardent, ardent race, high roller, are already in between minion and Aspen. I would say the Ikon lends itself to be the most predictable XC tire in this lineup if your goal is going fast. :/. I have the now older version and quite happy with it. Dual compound or 3C MaxxSpeed options 60 TPI or 120 TPI casing options EXO sidewall protection the Ardent is my least favorite tire that I have ever run. Both 2.35 on 27mm IW rims. If youre looking to ride loose and fast, but dont mind checking on trail conditions and taking care in sandy and muddy areas, the Ardent is a solid option. Manage Settings Its a trail tyre, through and through, sitting somewhere between the Crossmark and legendary Minion in terms of rolling speed/grip stakes. Thanks. However, the 2.6 version has been designed specifically for rims 30-35mm wide internally. Two thumbs up. The XR4s are quite voluminous for a 2.35 tyre and exhibit a wide footprint. Same situation here, switched from a 2.6 Rekon to a 2.6 Forekaster up front for basically the same reason. On that note, at $93 / 80 Maxxis is now sitting at the premium side of current tire pricing. But while the Ardent is dual-compound rubber in the center tread, the Forekaster is dual compound throughout. Pairing a slightly meatier tire up front with a faster rolling tire out back is normally how we roll with our XC-ish, light-trail setups, which some might describe as "down-county" bikes. Don't get me wrong, I love going hard on my Minion DHF/DHR combo. The XR4s actually surprised us with their durability and resilience considering the irreverent treatment we gave them. ADVANTAGE: MAXXIS, BY A MILE. Like the Ardent, the Forekaster offers very little in the way of rolling resistance and is a quiet ride when the tires are centered. Ive found myself in some sketchy situations when its slipped out on me in flat turns. I couldn't fault it at. A forum community dedicated to Mountain Bike owners and enthusiasts. Front and rear for speed with matched sizing, Front 2.35 and rear 2.2 for volume and speed, Rekon 2.4 in the front and 2.25 in the rear, Rekon up front in with faster rolling Ikon or Ardent race out back, Rekon in the rear with Forekaster or Minion DHR II in the front, Ardent front and rear same size comes stock on many bikes, Ardent up front with Ikon or Ardent Race out back, Ardent in the rear with Forekaster in the front, Ardent in the rear with Minion DHR II up front, Front and rear same size has to be really wet for this, While the Maxxis DHRII might be considered to be an all-mountain/enduro/downhill tire, it provides a great grip to weight ratio when it's in the 2.3 widths and EXO protection. The Maxxis Ardent is something of a do-it-all trail tire thats had relatively high success rates and popularity with mountain cyclists for a while now. Unlike some of their more aggressive trail tires, the Aggressor has a more moderate center tread profile, which is a nice middle ground between the super aggressive and the semi-slick options. Do they make the Ground Control with a Gravity casing? The tread isnt aggressive enough for thick loose soil or sandy conditions, and quickly loses traction in those conditions. The dual compound offers great grip and wear characteristics and adds to this combos value. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. When you purchase through links on our site, we may earn an affiliate commission, which supports our community. On my XC hardtail I've used Ardent Race (The race is a totally different tire)and Icon and Forkaster 2.6 front 2.35 rear. Front and rear for fastest rolling and max speed. We and our partners use cookies to Store and/or access information on a device. Review | Dynaplug tubeless repair tools continue to set the gold standard, Continental Tyre Review | Argotal, Kryptotal & Xynotal Tyres, Trek Fuel EX 2023 Review | A bigger, musclier & hugely adaptable trail bike, Specialized Stumpjumper Mullet Review | The Stumpy gets a bigger fork & mixed wheels, This website requires Javascript for optimum viewing purposes. It doesnt have the aggressive squared-off profile some cornering tires prefer, but its more rounded shape also doesnt have any dead zones or major loss of reactivity and grip. The Ardent marks yet another classic XC/Trail tire for Maxxis, bridging the gap between super fast rolling but sometimes not enough tread, and something more like a Minion DHR II that moves into large tread territory. It can also be used as a more aggressive front tire for XC racing when the terrain is technical or loose. With seven core tires that we looked at and with all of the tires coming with different widths, casings and rubber options, the possibilities really are endless. In your case, that would be the Ardent Race. That thicker design also provides greater longevity in the Minion. Drop questions if you have any. Contis Black Chili compound seems to improve with use. Use as a front paired with an Aspen or Ikon rear for an "aggressive" XC setup. Calling it a Goldilocks tire, Maxxis envisions the new Forekaster as the ideal step between their current XC options and more aggressive trail and enduro tires. To view the purposes they believe they have legitimate interest for, or to object to this data processing use the vendor list link below. I am currently riding on Maxxis Ikon 292.35 front and rear on my full suspension cross country bike. I personally really like to ride this tire out back, be it a 2.2 or 2.35. The outgoing model was already a great downcountry tire. The Rekon is made to be a bit more aggressive than the Ikon but with some additional tire tech. However, the Ardent is a better performer if youre looking for a most solid kind of grip in a responsive and speedy tire design. When it comes to Maxxis' treads, people tend to gravitate to the established gravity-meats (i.e., the Minion or High Roller series) or the pinner XC treads, such as the Ikon. MTB Parts & Accessories (Ep. We and our partners use data for Personalised ads and content, ad and content measurement, audience insights and product development. The Forekasters slightly more aggressive tread makes it a slightly more stable design for cornering than the Ardent, though both tire designs handle cornering rather well. Maxxis That said, if you already have the appropriate tools and a pneumatic pump on hand, theres no reason no to speed the whole process up. Great under brakes. Zach Overholt is the Editor in Chief of Bikerumor. Wow, 945g is pretty porky for an aggressive XC tire, thats dissector territory. Its a blocky tread that reminds us vaguely of the pattern found on Schwalbes Hans Dampf that cant be a bad thing and was developed with input from freeride guru Richie Schley. Thanks all, for the advice and recommendations. It also happens to be pretty light for the amount of traction it provides, which I don't think anyone will complain about. Maxxis DHR II 3C MaxxTerra rear. Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire - Singletracks Mountain Bike News Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire Mountain bike trails & Mountain bike reviews Protected: Forums Mountain Bike Forum Maxxis Ardent or Forekasters as a front tire Viewing 9 reply threads Author Posts June 1, 2019 at 19:52 #263456 pauldominy Little more bite on slickish conditions or loose climbs. Something to sit between the Aspen/Ikon/Ardent and the Assegai/Minion/Dissector. The Dissector is Maxxis' answer to consumers' desire for an all-around mountain bike tire, and given the fact that Aussie downhill pro Troy Brosnan was influential in its development, its versatility was baked in from the start. When I first saw the Rekon, I thought it looked like an XC version of a Maxxis High Roller II and Maxxis Minion combined. Maxxis all the way. Hang on though, the new Forekaster appears to be very much more of a wet weather XC tyre compared to the previous shallower tread version? 2.3 DHR2 3C and 2.3 Aggressor dual are my two main rear tyres. The Ardent has been part of the Maxxis lineup for years. Forekaster Ardent sidewalls seem to be a bit soft. The consent submitted will only be used for data processing originating from this website. That is, there is very little rolling resistance when youre riding the bike centered. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding. Plus, well cover some of what you can expect once youre actually out on the trail. Rekon The Forekaster is Maxxis's closest to the Nic- it's tougher, and heavier, but very similiar. https://www.dirtmerchantbikes.com/snorthwest-summer-2015-xc-tire-comparison-test. I think it's the fastest rolling tire and has recently been adopted by most of the XC World Cup Maxxis riders. Impetus - Interesting you would say that about liking the Rekon more for a rear. I was initially running a 2.35 Ikon on the back and while it has a surprising amount of grip, in the fall with the leaves on the ground, I found it lacking in traction when crawling up steep climbs and in the corners. CAD The Maxxis Ardent EXO is an excellent choice for the rider looking for a fast-rolling, efficient, and lightweight tire for XC style riding. I guess it maybe depends on your type of wet weather. Hopefully can get my hands on one! I think I found a better combo here for the mid travel trail bike and longer rides. The result is a tire that blends low rolling resistance . Tire , Currency: At 782g, the 27.52.6 is 92g heavier than the 2.35 Forekaster of the same diameter. Still, its always good to chat rubber init. But while the Ardent is dual-compound rubber in the center tread, the Forekaster is dual compound throughout. Maxxis's latest all-mountain/enduro category offering, the Aggressor, features dual-compound rubber and tubeless-ready construction, measures 2.3 inches wide (for 26, 650b and 29-inch wheels) and is offered in both the EXO and DoubleDown reinforced casings. You must be logged in to reply to this topic. Ill be after these as soon as theyre available. The Ride Concepts Womens Vice shoes are my current favourite flat pedal shoe, so I wanted to give the Mid version, with raised ankle, a go. This property in a tyre can often result from a softer, faster wearing compound not so with the XR4s. That brand reputation should definitely be considered when youre looking for a great tire since it comes with better assurances that the tire has actually been built to do what it says it can do. Ragley Big Wig, Surly Cross Check (gravel bike), Sunday Soundwave (BMX), 91 Schwinn High Plain (about town bike), Nashbar CXSS (on trainer). Best MTB Gear | Bontrager have really hit the mark with the XR4 tyres for all round aggressive trail use. This is a comparison of the Ardent versus some other fast rolling tires, albeit all in a narrower width as this comparison was for XC oriented tires: There was an interview of a Maxxis marketing guy on NSMB, he openly stated that he doesn't like the Ardent at all and there are better options from maxxis that do the same job better (Recon). Bikerumor Copyright 2013 2023. 3C is a good addition but I really dont want a tyre just shy of 1kg for my riding. Continue with Recommended Cookies. I know Geoff Kabush will often run this tire up front for more alternative XC races where the soil might be loose and soft like in the Downieville Classic, or wet slippery and unpredictable like the BC Bike Race. It measures 2.35 at the nobs and 2.3 at the casing on a 26mm internal width rim. Strengths: Meaty, moto-style tread digs into loose surfaces. RUB The Ardent is also decently fast-rolling considering the tread height and does decently well with clearing mud as well. Id say its been a Dissector and Rekon as a guess. You can choose how much grip you want, how fast the tire rolls, and what wheel you want to put it on with Maxxis. The 2 by 2 tread is also relatively squared off, which works to increase traction between your tire and the terrain. Grippy compound. Thats not a huge surprise since Maxxis is well known for producing high quality and durable tire sets. The Forekaster and Rekon combo is a popular setup for a lot of the NICA racers in Utah. Nobody mentions the Specialized Ground Control? Is this the best tire combo? This new Forekaster looks almost identical to the newer Nic, just with the trademark Maxxis ramped centre tread. The Ardent 2.4 is marketed as a do it all tire with high volume and comes in at 864g. As an all-weather, all-rounder, we rate the Ardents very highly. He has been writing about whats new in the bicycle world for 12+ years. Cannot be used in conjunction with other offers, or when switching memberships). Thick outside knobs really hold up to hard cornering and the rolling resistance is pretty good for a more aggressive tire. However, a tire like the Ardent thats less specialized and more of a generalist on the trail is also going to fall short of more specialized tires in their performance specialties. Forekaster are great all around tires, Adrdents are still ok tires IMO but honestly since riding 2.35 Forekaster and 2.4 Rekons I cant ever see riding an arent again either. The Fora platform includes forum software by XenForo. All rights reserved. They seemed like a decent tyre for my needs, especially for the weight but I miss the 3C compound on my newer pair. As Maxxis puts it, When an Aspen isnt enough tire but a Minion is too much, choose the new Maxxis Forekaster.. Stable sidewalls. Weaknesses: Not the best for tubeless use. Center and intermediate treat designs offer moderately good breaking traction, with performance thats neither the best nor the worst in Maxxis line. We only had one small gripe with the tyre in that we had to use a bit more sealant than we were used to prevent them losing air during the ride. Viewing 9 posts - 1 through 9 (of 9 total). Its no longer a XC tyre for damp conditions. The Aspen recently got a bit of a revamp with a wider casing option, 29 x 2.25. Frankly, I'm too scared (read: lack the skill) to ride those. As a front, rear, or double tire set, the Ardent is designed for moderately aggressive cyclists who like cornering at speed, but dont tend to take on trails with particularly loose soil or in highly adverse conditions. Thanks Ziphead, I just discovered that there is a Maxxis Ardent Race 2.35 tire. I will join in on the I don't like Ardent camp. With amazing braking traction and generous siping, the grip and control from a Maxxis DHRII are off the charts compared to any other Maxxis XC tire. With riders from Nino Schurter winning many races on this tire to the more adventure marathon riders like Geoff Kabush also riding this tire for a wide range of events, it shows its speed with results alone. Best Bike Trails | The transition nobs do their job translating to a predictable feel. Continue with Recommended Cookies. Forekaster - MAXXIS International Forekaster XC (Cross Country) Trail The original Forekaster was designed as a wet weather option for XC, while the new version is aimed squarely at modern short travel (100mm-130mm) trail bikes - aka the "downcountry" segment. The design offers the best traction on firm surfaces, with variable results in other conditions. Like mine, Ardent 2.4 front, prefer Ardent Race 2.2 to normal Ardent at the rear, both tubeless on the original flow rims. The Minion is a significantly heavier tire than the Ardent, but with that said, there are some definite advantages to the Minion if youre an especially aggressive rider, or if you tend to ride very rocky trails or trails with loosely packed dirt. Come join the discussion about bike parts, components, deals, performance, modifications, classifieds, trails, troubleshooting, maintenance, and more! New to the Maxxis mountain bike tire lineup a couple of years ago, the Aggressor has quickly become a go-to rear tire choice for a lot of riders. Based in Ohio, Zach is now slowly introducing a new generation to cycling and still trying to figure out how to fit the most rides into a busy schedule as a new dad. Just an update for anyone that might have the same question in the future It never gets easier, you just get faster. ~ Greg LeMond.

Belmont University Housing Costs, Portuguese Community In New Jersey, Articles M